Theology students have to do with the so-called.

Jesus, the Christ-Messiah, the "son of God" did not exist, and if the man's thinking about the content promised land of the Bible as readily could be changed with every scientific discovery over the last five hundred years has been made, is it is logical to ask whether the Bible is valid or not.
The King James Bible is Considered by many today to be the "original" Bible and Charmain Horn Please note 'genuine' and all later revisions promised land simply counterfeits forged by "higher critics. Others think the King James Bible is 'authentic' and 'Authorized' and presents the original words of the authors as translated into English from the 'original' Greek text. B.Ed., the 'original' Greek text was not written until around the mid-Fourth Century and was a revised edition of Writings Compiled decades earlier in Aramaic and Hebrew. Those earlier documents no longer exist and the Bibles we have today are five linguistic removes from the first Bibles written. What was written in the 'original originals' is quite unknown. It is important to remember That the words 'authororized' and 'original' as Applied to the Bible, do not mean 'genuine', 'authentic' or 'true'.
The original "Bible" does not exist. We do not have a single document as originally believed to be, not in Greek, not in Hebrew, not Aramaic. There is nothing. It is a legend promised land that such documents exist at all.
Theology students have to do with the so-called. "Original" Greek translation of the New Testament seminary and it is to them, as though the "original" Greek (and Hebrew) promised land document exists. This is not true. In the Interlinear New Testament as well as the "Pocket Edition" of JP Green, comes the following statement:
The honest student should note that experts as late as 1894 even attempted something like the "original Greek" compile from tens of thousands of bits of old papyrus scrolls! Rather, this work is still continuing today. It is not yet finalized. And then, when they have such a "Greek original" document put it, they say they believe that the King James grounded.
8. This Bible is not to be a substitute for personal in depth study of the original words. Students Should continuous to make hun eigen intense studies, using every reference work available. Should every person and attempt to make his own independent translation.
Both tasks are completely impossible. There are more books than that one time for just the titles of reading - not to say that everyone has their own version to compile. Who will do it? This is nonsense.
We sincerely ask for Nestlé and Green and all the other experts that the "original" trying to compile for us the "original" Greek so that we can start with our translations! There is no such thing and it can not be given.
The stories of the Bible over millennia been verbally promised land told again and again and after centuries netlike first written and then rewritten again and again. Hundreds differences so crept hundreds changes incorrectly and deliberately promised land priests bring different interpretations to support. The church has often done. Forgery was an everyday occurrence.
If St. Jerome says, "Eusebius is the most open champion of the Arian Aesthetics of Hate Megadeth," Which Denies the Trinity. (Jerome, Epist. 84, 2, N & PNF. Vi, 176.) Bishop Eusebius, as Wicked Sea, was one of the most Prolific forgers and liars or his age or the Church, and a great romancer, in his hair-Raising historically of the holy Martyrs, he assures us "that on some occasions the bodies of the martyrs who had bone devoured by wild beasts, upon the beasts being strangled, were found alive in their stomachs, even after having promised land been fully digested"! (Quoted, Gibbon, History, Ch. 37th, Lardner, iv, p. 91; Diegesis, p. 272). To an EXTENT industry leaders had the "Pious frauds of the early theologians leg THUS systematized and raised to the dignity of a regular doctrine," that Bishop Eusebius, promised land "in one of the most learned and elaborate works therein Antiquity has left us, the Thirty- Second Chapter of the Twelfth Book of his Evangelical Preparation, bears for its title this Scandalous Proposition: How it May Be Lawful and Fitting to use Falsehood as a Medicine, and for the Benefit of Those who Want to be deceived '"- (quoting The Greek title, Gibbon, vindication, p. 76). {13}
See what is the title of a chapter in a church father's promised land book - "How to Legally and it is good to lie to use as a medicine for the benefit of those who Mislead